<palmer.william@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:lmiopvssnhps3tlnpifnri6inqh09gv0ql@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 05:37:37 GMT, "palmer.william"
> <palmer.william@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
The best way to explain this forging fruitcake is to stress first
of all that I am a writer. By contrast, he is a forger who cannot
point to pride to ONE thing he has written. We can safely
assume that, because if he had any reason to experience a
writer's pride in his work, he would far too ashamed and
humiliated to do what he has been doing. Having no talent
of his own, he cannot begin to fathom a writer's pride in the
name the writer has made famous through his successful
efforts.
In contrast, while my "Facts in the Case of Bill Palmer" so far only
consists of two autobiograhical pieces from what may well become
a book, it is already the most famous such work ever written for
newsgroup audiences. Fifteen hundred Google GEMS,
it has, and believe me that is not from reposting because
I only reposted it once, a few years back.
Now, this is where someone usually chortles, demanding, who writes
their autobiograhpy in Usenet? Well, thousands of people have, not
their full autobiograhy, perhaps, but some of them have posted far
larger sections of their personal story than I have. And in many
cases the works are forgotten almost immediately, because they
are poorly written or lack the ring of truth.
"Facts" is only small part of the body of written work which has made
me so well known. A few of the hundreds of others stand-alone
postings are "Prosthetic Extension," "Yes, MARY KENNEDY, you try
to square things with the BIG boss!" "If this be webtrance..." "HOW I
STOLE THE BILL PALMER NAME!" "Word Screens of the World,"
"Gothic Whispers," "Uncanny Resemblance," "The Vast Humor of Dali,"
"Remembered: the Rootbeer Stand Riot," "MORE ELDRITCH THAN
FICTION!" and hundreds of others.
THAT is why our forging rodent fantacized that he was me,
despite his wildly varying fabrications regarding reasons for his
turning internet forger. THAT, that well-known body of written
work, represents the reason that his fantasies carried him away
to the point where he actually started counterfieiting my postings
to attract the readers that his feeble, poorly written efforts could
never earn for him.
Now, most people are aware of that, but some might not
be, so it is im****tant that I review the facts more frequently.
Again, the forger was attracted to me because I am the
best known writer in Usenet. There can be no mistaking that
central fact, despite his several wispy smoke screens aimed
at concealing what I point out once again above.
There is no humor at all involved in what he
does. At times, he tries to don a foolish-looking figleaf of
satire, but when you consider the matter, his satirical rationale
is absurd. Had he even ONE satirical bone his talentless body,
he could write all the lampoons, etc., about me that he wants to.
But you see, even doing a puerile lampoon takes SOME talent.
For an envious poltroon like the Snip and Drool Doppelganger,
it is much easier to forge and deceive the readers.
Further, his writing style is nothing at all like mine. He is
crude. He is a one trick pony, and his sole schtick is to
play the keyboarding warthog. He fools no one, but he
certainly annoys me for precisely the same reason that
a car thief who stole my automobile would be annoying.
No one should be at all surprised on that score.
All in all, this forging nutcase lacks humor, imagination,
and the iota of writing skill one needs to earn a few readers.
That's why he turned to name stealing. That much should be
so obvious to all that it astonishes me to see some people
speculating on anything as transparent as the motivations
of a talentless, mentally disturbed dimwit whose envy and
lack of writing talent drives him to internet forgery.
accept no cheap imitations:
the alt.genius.bill-palmer
--firing posts at random from a window in a office
above rec.arts.prose
>
> >Please note that forged postings bearing my name and
> >address are still showing up in alt.usage.english and in a
> >number of writing groups. Some newsgroup readers
> >are aware of the situation, but I am posting
> >this disclaimer in case there is anyone present who does
> >not know about the problem. Before concluding that I
> >have made an a.u.e. post, please check the headers.
>
> _You_ are a damn idiot. _You_ could be using _any_ news server in
> the world, not just Prodigy's. What's more, how is somebody
> supposed to distinguish between _you_, a master of vanity, and
> _me_? What makes _you_ the real palmer.william? What happens when
> the supposed forger also uses Prodigy?
>
> Moreover, why would anybody bother checking headers on a posting
> from _any_ palmer.william??
>
> There ain't no "problem" at all, Mr. Bill.
>
> Go away, little boy!
>
> (Signed)
>
> "palmer.william"
>
> the alt.damn.idiot.bill-palmer
> --firing posts at passersby at random from a window in
> the office above never neverland
|
